Claude Opus 4.8 Tops The Intelligence Index Yet Mythos Dominates Hacking
Anthropic released its newest model, Claude Opus 4.8, this week with a slim lead on an intelligence benchmark, yet it trails the firm's restricted Mythos system on writing software exploits.
The company rolled out Opus 4.8 this week and priced it at $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output, holding the rate level with the prior Opus 4.7.
Independent testers report the model now leads the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at 61.4, an aggregate of ten evaluations, just ahead of GPT-5.5 at 60.2. Anthropic casts the upgrade as a modest, incremental step rather than the generational leap its naming might suggest.
On agentic coding, Opus 4.8 scores 69.2% on SWE-bench Pro, a benchmark that asks a model to fix real bugs inside large code repositories, while GPT-5.5 reaches 58.6%.
The two systems run nearly even on graduate-level science questions, both landing close to 94%, and Opus 4.8 narrowly leads a broad reasoning exam its predecessors trailed.
Mythos sits above both on the hardest engineering work, posting 77.8% on that same coding benchmark and a wider lead on tasks that mix code with screenshots. Anthropic restricts Mythos to a vetted set of partners under its Project Glasswing program, rather than selling it openly. It charges $25 and $125 per million tokens for the preview, five times the Opus rate.
Also Read: Zcash Cools After A 6% Drop While Monero Steals The Spotlight
The widest gap shows up in offensive security.
With safeguards switched off, Mythos produced a full working exploit on 70.8% of Firefox targets in Anthropic's own evaluations, while Opus 4.8 cleared just 8.8%.
On a separate test drawn from open-source code, Opus 4.8 failed to score on 61.5% of targets, more than double the 23.3% miss rate posted by Mythos.
A public cross-model trial run by Berkeley RDI paired each system with its own coding agent across 898 real-world vulnerabilities, where Mythos wrote 157 working exploits to GPT-5.5's 120.
GPT-5.5 still held an edge on kernel-level exploitation, leading Mythos 22 to 12 on that narrow slice. The UK AI Security Institute placed it slightly ahead of Mythos on expert cyber tasks, at 71.4% to 68.6%.
Anthropic unveiled Mythos in April after the model found thousands of previously unknown flaws across major operating systems and every leading web browser, with hundreds reported in Firefox alone. The company then withheld it from public release, wary that the same exploit-writing skills could aid attackers as readily as the defenders it was built to help.
Read Next: Strategy Pulls $30M In Bitcoin Back, Cooling Sell-Off Fears
Related Stories
AI News
New ‘Slack Code’ turns AI coding into a team activity
54 minutes ago
AI News
Salesforce wants to move AI coding into a shared workspace with Slack Code
54 minutes ago
Vietnam introduces annual AI lessons for school students
54 minutes ago
AI News
Tech Decoded : what Hyundai and Kia are really doing with artificial intelligence
1 hour ago
AI News
The learning curve for AI in schools
2 hours ago
AI News
AI is changing music: What happens to artists?
3 hours ago
AI News
OpenAI adds an AI safety layer to detect misuse without retaining enterprise data
3 hours ago
AI News
Pope Leo XIV: In age of AI, the family is the first school of humanity
3 hours ago