MPs split on whether to end hybrid Parliament rules

MPs split on whether to end hybrid Parliament rules

Is it time to end the remote voting and meetings introduced during the pandemic?

During the pandemic, members of Parliament began voting and attending committee meetings from home. Six years later, parliamentarians are divided over whether those hybrid rules should remain in place.

In March 2020, the House of Commons adopted a motion allowing the health and finance committees to meet virtually. Four months later, the first House of Commons sitting took place in hybrid format, with some members attending the Commons chamber in person and others dialing in by video conference.

Today, it's common for members of Parliament to cast votes on their phones during announcements, or even while they're out to dinner.

At the U.S.-Canada Summit in June, Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation Minister Evan Solomon paused a discussion to vote from his phone.

But even as private and public sector employees return to their offices, MPs remain divided on whether it's time to end the hybrid Parliament rules.

Major banks and companies like RBC, Bank of Montreal and Rogers have increased the amount of time workers are required to be in the office. Thousands of provincial government employees have been called back to the office full-time.

Many federal public servants started a new work schedule last month that requires them to be in the office four days a week. Executive public servants returned to the office full-time in May.

Nathan Prier, president of the Canadian Association of Professional Employees, said it seems "contradictory" to deny public service workers the kind of work flexibility enjoyed by members of Parliament.

"Parliamentarians have clearly seen the benefits of remote work with the way technology assists in connecting with colleagues and the savings it generates for Canadian taxpayers," said Prier, who leads a union that represents more than 27,000 federal public sector workers.

The Public Service Alliance of Canada argues in favour of the hybrid Parliament, saying that flexible work arrangements can help MPs fulfil their responsibilities both in Parliament and in their ridings.

"We have been highlighting the advantages of remote work for several years and believe that all workers should have access to remote or hybrid work options where operational requirements allow and the work can be performed effectively," reads a statement from the union.

The Professional Institute of the Public Service said in a statement that "the answer to an arbitrary return-to-office mandate is not necessarily another arbitrary mandate for Parliamentarians."

Members of Parliament seem to have mixed opinions about the hybrid work rules.

Conservative MP Michael Chong told the House of Commons in February he thinks Canada should "end hybrid Parliament."

"We are the only national legislature amongst western Liberal democracies to remain in hybrid mode," he said.

The U.K. House of Commons ended hybrid sittings in 2021, while the U.S. House of Representatives ended proxy voting in 2023.

Replying to Chong, Liberal MP Corey Hogan said that as a father of three young children, he has "really appreciated the flexibility that hybrid sittings have allowed on those unique occasions when it was necessary."

Dozens of senators routinely miss key votes in the Red Chamber

Just how many days do provincial politicians spend legislating? We did the math

"My father was in the hospital recently, in the ICU for 11 days, and being able to be there at his bedside and do my work for Parliament from the hospital was really important to me."

Bloc Québécois MP Yves Perron told the Commons that remote participation should be allowed for health of family reasons, but MPs "should not be in a public place or in a car.

"We have seen all kinds of foolish and ridiculous situations," Perron said. "The hybrid Parliament absolutely needs to be tweaked."