Trump administration to pause controversial anti

Trump administration to pause controversial anti-weaponization fund after court ruling

Fund saw backlash from Democrats, some Republicans over potential payouts to Jan. 6 rioters

Trump's new $1.776B Anti-Weaponization Fund is a wild ride | About That

The Justice Department said Monday it will comply with a court ruling temporarily blocking a nearly $1.8-billion US fund meant to compensate allies of U.S. President Donald Trump, effectively agreeing to pause the plan for at least two weeks after court setbacks and a backlash from Republicans who objected to potential payouts to participants in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol.

The announcement came in response to a Friday court ruling by a federal judge in Virginia who ordered plans for the fund halted pending additional arguments later this month. The department said in a statement that it "disagrees strongly" with the ruling but would abide by it.

Senate Republicans — who revolted against the settlement two weeks ago — were to meet Tuesday to discuss the next steps and get more information from the Trump administration about the future of the fund.

It wasn't clear from the statement, posted on social media, if the Trump administration planned to resume implementation of the fund in the event the judge lifts her order blocking it, or whether it intended to retreat more permanently from its heavily scrutinized plan to compensate individuals who believe they have been unfairly targeted by the criminal justice system.

The Trump administration had defended the Anti-Weaponization Fund, established to resolve Trump's lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns, as an appropriate corrective measure to make up for what officials insist was weaponized law enforcement during the Biden administration. Trump supporters, including participants in the Capitol riot, celebrated the announcement of the fund.

The Department of Justice disagrees strongly with the decision on the Anti-Weaponization Fund put forth by the United States District Court Judge in the Eastern District of Virginia, wherein the Court stated that, under no circumstances, may the Department of Justice proceed with…

Caught in the middle is legislation that would fund Trump's immigration enforcement agencies for three years. Republicans abruptly left town on May 21 without passing it after Democrats said they would offer amendments to scrap or scale back the judgment fund, forcing Republicans to go on the record for or against it.

On that day, Republican senators pressed Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche over the fund at a closed-door gathering that Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas called one of "the roughest meetings I've seen in my entire time in the Senate."

The fund's future was called into question late last week by a pair of court rulings.

Hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants line up to apply for Trump fund payout

One judge in Virginia temporarily halted its formation and scheduled a June 12 hearing for arguments on whether to extend her order barring the government from moving forward with the fund while pending litigation challenges it.

"This fund was open to anybody who was so weaponized, targeted, or persecuted, whether they were Democrat, Republican, Conservative, Independent, or otherwise," the Justice Department said in a statement in which it asserted its disagreement with the ruling. "The department will abide by the court's ruling."

Separately, the federal judge in Florida overseeing Trump's lawsuit against the IRS ordered Trump's attorneys to respond to "grievous allegations" by settlement critics that the president abandoned his claims to avoid the court's scrutiny of an illegal deal. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams gave them until June 12 to respond in writing to allegations of collusion and whether the case should be reopened because the court was the "victim of a fraud."