We must reject any notion of AI consciousness
Anil Seth is right to point out that to overestimate artificial intelligence is to underestimate ourselves (Once again we are told AI may be conscious – I study consciousness, and I have my doubts, 15 July). But he is wrong only to have doubts about whether AI systems like Claude may become conscious. He should be certain, and should say so more forcefully.
It’s not like anything to be Claude, just as it’s not like anything to be a washing machine. An academic education is not required to realise that, common sense will do. Artificial intelligence systems won’t become conscious for the same reason they won’t become pregnant; they’re not that sort of thing.
Used well, Claude is of great benefit. But because it can simulate having experience doesn’t mean it actually has it. Like Richard Dawkins, Seth seems merely to be unsure about this. Such tepid equivocation from leading figures in the field is disappointing; only resounding rejection will do.Dr John PickeringLeamington Spa, Warwickshire
Related Stories
AI News
Bill Gross bets AI can help mass
3 weeks ago
AI News
Nigeria records 93% rise in AI micro
3 weeks ago
AI News
The Italian gelato maker using AI to invent new flavours
3 weeks ago
AI News
Closing the Gap Between Agentic CX Pilots and Production
3 weeks ago
AI News
New Brunswick data centre debate highlights cross
3 weeks ago
AI News
How to Structure an AI Agent Referral Fee Agreement Between Startups
3 weeks ago
AI News
No, AI didn’t delete a Swedish reality TV series
3 weeks ago
AI News
There is no AI in Armageddon. Artificial intelligence is a tool, not an apocalypse
3 weeks ago